DEAR EDITOR: I am at a loss to understand the fuss being made by Mr Sat Maharaj, allegedly on behalf of the Hindu community, over the Trinity as in “Trinity Cross”.
Is it that Mr Maharaj repudiates Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva, the acknowledged Trinity of the Hindus? Does he say that that belief is false, or without merit? If this trio is integral to the Hindu religion, then why decry the word Trinity in the Trinity Cross? The name “Trinity” in the award also has meaningful significance for the Hindus.
Its significance need not be limited to Christians. I can understand and do accept his problem with “Cross” as a distinctly Christian symbol. But “Trinity” is not exclusively Christian. Maybe Mr Maharaj would be willing to accept a “Trinity Medal” for his work in Religion.
I might further add that the second member of the Hindu Trinity was incarnated in Lord Krishna, even as the second person of the Christian Blessed Trinity was incarnated in Jesus Christ, and in the respective religions there is analogy between Lord Krishna and Jesus Christ, even though one is distinctly Hindu in concept and the other Christian.
Rather than find reasons for promoting divisions between the religions in our multi-religious society, in many ways the envy of the world, would Mr Maharaj not be better occupied in finding and high-lighting what can draw them together – such as the concept of Trinity in the Godhead?
The Muslims, on the other hand, can have a legitimate problem with both Trinity and Cross. But they have voiced no complaint. Maybe they recognise, and accept, the historical link between the island discovered by Columbus some 500 years ago and the Christian traditions it inherited since then. That tradition was here before either the Hindus or the Muslims. Together we aspire, together we achieve.
Fr Gerard E Farfan, AEC Secretariat, Gray St, Port of Spain |