THE EDITOR: As a very satisfied and successful product of Catholic education in Trinidad ( St Joseph 's Boys' RC and St Mary's College), I take issue with your editorial “Making Catholic Education More Catholic”.
I fail to see how teaching students to excel, and as a result, to be successful in their careers (and so become "economically successful"), or to "secure top SAT scores" is somehow not "Catholic" education. Or, what's not "Catholic" about "focussing on academics" or on producing competitive students?
Not giving opportunities for education to poor children, or neglecting students with learning difficulties, or not preparing students to succeed in a competitive world, is simply poor education. It has nothing to do with "Catholic" or non-denominational education.
And on this matter, I would like to point out to the writer of the editorial that the Catholic schools as I knew them (including St Mary's College, the most elite secondary school in my time) did indeed include students from all levels of society, from intact families and “broken” families and all races.
Catholic schools successfully prepared students from all those backgrounds for the most competitive exams and scholarships. Catholic secondary schools also had classes to deal specifically with students with learning difficulties. And that was decades before the current much ballyhooed programme here in the USA of “No child left behind”. Apart from their emphasis on excellence, one distinguishing characteristic of Catholic schools has been their insistence on student responsibility. I see no reference to this feature in the editorial. Perhaps it would be useful to include this most Catholic element in the writer's vision of a “Catholic Education”.
Good "Catholic" education is good education. There's no need to make such a complex undertaking more difficult by adding those allusions to the Bible, allusions that are better applied to another realm of the Church's mission.
Louis Sellier, lmsell@comcast.net
Seattle, WA 98199, USA |